[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retaining interpreter when running script from command line
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: retaining interpreter when running script from command line |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:15:03 -0500 |
On 3-Mar-2005, E. Joshua Rigler <address@hidden> wrote:
| This option does what I *said* I wanted, but it is not what I actually
| need ;^). If I use --funcall, I have to find some way to pass any
| variables I might set in FUNC back to the interpreter. I can think of
| no good way to do this.
Yes, after I sent my previous message, I thought that might be what you
really wanted.
It would not be hard to add an option like
octave --eval "arbitrary-code"
but if we do this, do we also need --funcall?
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------