Re: Cannot return an Array3

[Søren Hauberg]

John W. Eaton wrote:
[snip]
> You probably don't really need
> Array3<double>.  It would just be converted to an NDArray object
> internally, so that's the type I would recommend using.
So I shouldn't use ArrayN<double> either?

/Søren

> Looking at it now, Array3 looks redundant and should probably go away.
>
> jwe
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
>
> Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------