|
From: | Michael Grossbach |
Subject: | Re: QtOctave for windows and questions |
Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:58:06 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
That's what I had always thought, yes. But the two seem to behave differently in respect to QtOctave (at least that was my impression from -chris' and my experience). That's why I stressed I don't use the obviously-cygwin-octave but rather the does-not -seem-to-have-cygwin-octave ;)Isn't that version really just a standalone minimal Cygwin installation that includes Octave (even if it doesn't appear to be "Cygwin")?
Michael
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |