help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: error: memory exhausted -- trying to return to prompt


From: Robert A. Macy
Subject: Re: error: memory exhausted -- trying to return to prompt
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:58:13 -0700

My reader is only a text reader and bold does not show up.

However, if you go to 
C:\Program Files\GNU*\bin
and type int EXACTLY the two lines starting with
  regtool

But ONE mistake and big trouble, so that's why I wrote the
batch file, easy to paste to, easy to edit, and then just
run it.

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
 rambovn <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your reply.
> I already make some lines bolded. Are they the folder
> that contain you
> octave file? 
> Regards 
> Anh
> 
> Robert A. Macy wrote:
> > 
> > I'm running 2.1.50a on WinXP and used to have that same
> problem when
> > dealing with 20-30MB files until..
> > I expanded the memory, then never happened again, plus
> instead of 12
> > minutes the program only took 2 minutes, since it
> didn't have to swap to
> > HD all the time.  
> > 
> > somewhere in the email archives is the discussion on
> how to do it, but
> > you're lucky.  It worked on my WinXP this was a little
> batch program that
> > would extend the memory enough for my needs.  Due to
> word wrap, I'll
> > separate each line with a space
> > 
> > cd\
> > 
> > cd Program Files\GNU*\bin
> > 
> > regtool -i set "/HKCU/Software/GNU
> Octave/Cygwin/heap_chunk_in_mb" 1024
> > 
> > regtool -v list "/HKCU/Software/GNU Octave/Cygwin"
> > 
> > cd\
> > 
> > cd Documents and Settings\Robert\My Documents
> > 
> > 
> > Or make it larger than 1024, but I didn't need that
> much.  Seems octave
> > was marginal for me before.  Try it out and see if that
> fixes the problem.
> > 
> > the binary of 2.9.12 was kindly provided, has a known
> 'exit' bug.  Seems
> > to be stable for me.  BUT, the plotting functions
> deteriorated too much
> > for my needs. so I keep both available.
> > 
> > For example, the old gnuplot gsplot would put up a
> matrix 400 by 400 and
> > you can rotate it well with the mouse, but the plotting
> with 2.9.12 [so
> > far] I can only get equivalent speed of rotating with
> mouse on a matrix
> > about 25 by 25. useless for my needs.  I could be doing
> something wrong.
> > But the problem is 2.1.50a has 150 custom functions and
> scripts that RELY
> > upon gnuplot.  
> > 
> > Robert
> > 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]