[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
version of SuiteSparse?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
version of SuiteSparse? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:12:49 -0400 |
On 16-Oct-2007, Ben Abbott wrote:
| I'm working on putting together Fink packages for Metis and SuiteSparse to
enable the Fink version of Octave (on OS X) to use SuiteSparse.
Metis is optional. It is also not free software with a GPL compatible
license, so you should not distribute Octave binaries that are linked
with it. Instead, build the SuiteSparse library in a way that it does
not depend on Metis.
| Can someone tell me which version of SuiteSparse should be used?
|
| The info on the web I located appears to indicate 2.4.0.
|
| However, since SuiteSparse is presently at 3.0.0, I thought I'd ask
| in the event info I found on the web is out of date.
What info on the web would that be?
Sorry, I don't know the details about the best version of SuiteSparse
to use, but the Debian packages are apparently based on 3.0.0.
jwe
- compiling the bleeding-edge on OS X, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/11
- Re: compiling the bleeding-edge on OS X, John Swensen, 2007/10/11
- Re: compiling the bleeding-edge on OS X, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/14
- version of SuiteSparse?, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/16
- version of SuiteSparse?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Ben Abbott, 2007/10/16
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2007/10/16
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/18
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, Thomas Weber, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: version of SuiteSparse?, David Bateman, 2007/10/16