[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Q: Re Qtoctave

From: Terry Duell
Subject: Re: Q: Re Qtoctave
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:41:09 +1000
User-agent: Messenger-Pro/2.62 (MsgServe/2.05) (RISC-OS/4.39) POPstar/2.05

In message 25 Feb
 "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>  wrote:

> On 25-Feb-2008, Terry Duell wrote:
> | Hullo All,
> | I would like to try qtoctave, and went to the download page and found the
> | following binaries...
> What "download page"?

The qtoctave download page. See
> | easy_plot-20080122.i386.rpm (5.25 MB)
> | qtoctave_0.68-1.i386.deb    (1.49 MB)
> | qtoctave_0.7.1-1.i386.rpm   (994 KB)
> | qtoctave-bin-linux-i386-0.6.7.tar.gz (5.14 MB)
> | qtoctave-bin-linux-i386-0.6.8.tar.gz (5.14 MB)
> | 
> | I haven't been able to find any explanation on the site as whether all or
> | some or only one of these qtoctave binaries are needed.
> | Clearly one would only need the .deb or the .rpm, not both, but does one
> | also need one of the 'qtoctave-bin-linux' binaries as well? They all
> | seem to be different versions. Some clarification from someone who
> | knows would be appreciated.
> Maybe you should ask the qtoctave developers?

Maybe I should.
Sorry if the question offends, but as only an octave user would use qtoctave
and I subscribe to this list, I didn't think it an unreasonable question to
ask here. There has been discussion here about qtoctave in the past.

Terry Duell

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]