[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure
From: |
Labitt, Bruce |
Subject: |
RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2008 10:46:59 -0400 |
-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitri A. Sergatskov [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 7:04 PM
To: Labitt, Bruce
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Labitt, Bruce
<address@hidden> wrote:
> [Labitt, Bruce]
>
> Thanks. That helped. I'm getting a little closer. When I do a make
> check I pass all the tests except rand.cc where I fail 14 tests, plus
a
> few tests where I know I have not installed stuff like qhull.
However,
> at the test linear-algebra/condest.m I get a panic: Segmentation
fault.
> Any clues as where to look? Flush/repeat?
condest code relies on blas/lapack libraries and those are probably not
compiled with 64-bit integers for matrix indexing...
>
> I tried running octave nonetheless and could not seem to plot anything
> with more than 100 elements. Whenever I did a plot or use grid I
would
> get 4 lines
>
> line xxxxxxx: undefined variable: in
> line xxxxxxx: undefined variable: in
> line xxxxxxx: undefined variable: in
> line xxxxxxx: undefined variable: lw
>
> I'd be greatful for any help.
>
what is your version of gnuplot?
Do you have mouse support enabled (i.e.
can you zoom with mouse when you do plot
something) ?
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
Dmitri.
--
[Labitt, Bruce]
I think I may not have compiled ATLAS and LAPACK with 64 bit. I'll
check on that. My version of gcc is 4.1.2 (Red Hat 4.1.2-14)
GNUPLOT Version 4.0 patchlevel 0 was the binary I installed. I can
uninstall it and compile 4.2.3 if it will matter...
Thanks,
Bruce
- Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/09
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure,
Labitt, Bruce <=
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/12
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/12
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, David Bateman, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08