[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks? |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:57:47 -0500 |
2008/7/24 Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden>:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Kyusik Chung <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Plus, no one
>> has contributed the time to put together any documentation, nor is
>> that on any priority list.
>>
>
> Yeah, not even you. It's not hard to guess why this is a low priority
> thing for Octave developers - they study how the sources work, and
> then they know, and they no longer need such docs.
Hm, I'm thinking that this might not be so hard to do, only
time-consuming. Would Doxygenising the sources be sufficient?
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, (continued)
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/07/27
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/24
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Kyusik Chung, 2008/07/25
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: Octave C++ performance benchmarks?, Søren Hauberg, 2008/07/27