[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab
From: |
Howard |
Subject: |
Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:40:24 +0000 |
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
The attached files are codes for testing the executive time.
As you can see that below are my executive result, it looks Octave's
executive speed is slower than Matlab. I thought Octave should be better
than Matlab. Do you have any idea about it?
Thanks!
*Octave on Ubuntu Linux
ExecutiveTime.m 3.876s
BinomialEuro.m 20.8s
BlackScholesEuro.m 0.0594s
*Octave on Windows
ExecutiveTime.m 9.97s
BinomialEuro.m 41.1s
BlackScholesEuro 0.235s
*Matlab on Windows
ExecutiveTime.m 0.0176s
BinomialEuro.m 0.092721s
BlackScholesEuro 0.000835s
Best regards,
Howard Su
BinomialEuro.m
Description: Text Data
BlackScholesEuro.m
Description: Text Data
ExecutiveTime.m
Description: Text Data
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, (continued)
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, wim van hoydonck, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/01/02
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, wim van hoydonck, 2009/01/05
- Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/02
Re: compare the executive speed with Matlab,
Howard <=