[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: octave vs. matlab vectorization

From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: octave vs. matlab vectorization
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:29:52 -0400

On 14-Sep-2009, matt wrote:

| ah, no! code 1 was *faster* under matlab! the ratio is 0.19:1
| i find this result quite staggering.

Why?  As someone else already explained, Matlab has a JIT compiler
that can, in some cases at least, compile loops into native code so
that it runs faster and Octave does not have a JIT compiler.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]