Re: How do you pass two Octave functions to an .oct function?

[babelproofreader]

>Instead of doing it in a for loop, I'd suggest you construct a matrix
>with one rolling vector per column:

How would this compare, in terms of performance, to my function as it
currently stands if I were able to successfully compile the whole function
into a single .oct function using loops? I ask this question as I envisage
that teaching myself how to/and rewriting/changing the .oct files that are
currently called to operate over matrix columns will be a considerable
effort.


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/How-do-you-pass-two-Octave-functions-to-an-.oct-function--tp25870717p25990720.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.