help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sprank


From: Judd Storrs
Subject: Re: sprank
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:54:27 -0400

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:29 PM, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Unfortunately some companies legal policy require such guff, so please note
> that by doing such a thing you're probably punishing the victim

Am I expected to submit these things to my employer's legal council
before replying? Isn't that punishing the receiver, too? The legal
boilerplate in the original message is 80% of the text. I guess one
could take the probably risky approach of just ignoring them. I am not
a lawyer and I have no idea how Israeli law about defense contractors
works or interacts with local/state/national/international laws where
I live. That's why I asked him to clarify if I'm allowed to send a
reply to the content of the message. I figure the legal boilerplate
isn't part of the content, so asking about the boilerplate should be
ok. Then again maybe I'm wrong. Companies aren't going to change their
policies if they don't get feedback.


--judd


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]