[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Too Basic: Ending limit of array
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: Too Basic: Ending limit of array |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:22:27 +0100 |
On 6 Dec 2010, at 09:16, Isak Delberth Davids wrote:
> Hi octavians,
>
> This is so basic that I could not get search words for googling, and
> similarly it took me 7.9 minutes to get a title for it. Embarrassed!
>
> I thought the following must give me "error: subscript indices must be either
> positive integers or logicals."
> A = 1:7.9
> but it gives the same result as
> A = 1:7.1
> so that it looks like
> A = 1:floor(7.9)
> I think 7.9 and 7.1 are not "positive integers".
Actually
A = 1:7.1
is (almost [*]) equivalent to:
i = 1;
A(i) = 1;
while A(i)+1 < 7.1
A(i++) = A(i) + 1;
endwhile
so A IS all positive integers.
>> 1:7.9
ans =
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
if you try
A=1.1:7
you will not get positive integers. You will only get the error you expected if
you use A as an index.
> Sorry for taking you so low down on this innocent Monday's morning!
>
> Isak
HTH,
c.
[*] It would have been exactly equivalent if you had written:
A = [1:7.1]