[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can
From: |
Alexander Hansen |
Subject: |
Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:54:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/4/11 9:03 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Hi. I'm the maintainer for Octave for the Fink project, serving
> Mac OS X.
>
> One of our users reported a problem in Octave-3.4.3, built as
> 32-bit, on Mac OS 10.6.8, which I confirmed, wherein 'pkg' was
> unable to install anything, e.g :
>
> octave:1> pkg -verbose install physicalconstants-0.1.7.tar.gz mkdir
> (/var/tmp/oct-2rjbOh) untar (physicalconstants-0.1.7.tar.gz,
> /var/tmp/oct-2rjbOh) invalid assignment to cs-list outside multiple
> assignment error: called from `dir' in file
> /sw32/share/octave/3.4.3/m/miscellaneous/dir.m near line 115,
> column 26 error: called from: error:
> /sw32/share/octave/3.4.3/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 832, column 5 error:
> /sw32/share/octave/3.4.3/m/pkg/pkg.m at line 361, column 9
>
> I've tried removing some semicolons to see if I can debug where
> this goes awry, but it appears to be simply the assignment on line
> 115 of dir.m:
>
> info(i,1).name = fn;
>
>
> In contrast, a 64-bit build on the same machine works properly.
> The two builds use the same C and C++ compilers:
>
> octave:4> octave_config_info('CC_VERSION') ans = 4.2.1 (Apple Inc.
> build 5666) (dot 3) octave:5> octave_config_info('CXX_VERSION') ans
> = 4.2.1
>
> (Xcode tools 3.2.6) but different Fortran compilers: a 32-bit
> gfortran and a 64-bit gfortran, respectively, for the 32-bit and
> 64-bit Octave.
>
> Apart from the expected differences I'd naively expect from 32 vs.
> 64 bits, I also saw a few other things. The 64-bit build's
> configuration had:
>
> checking for working mktime... no
>
> vs. "yes" on the 32-bit one. Also, the 64-bit build had
>
> checking for working nanosleep... no (mishandles large arguments)
>
> whereas the 32-bit one had "yes". Only the 32-bit build was given
> the -mieee-fp modifier ("flag-sort -r" is a Perl script that we use
> that changes the ordering of arguments to the compiler--it was
> needed in this case because of a conflict with another package):
>
> checking whether flag-sort -r gcc accepts -mieee-fp... yes
> configure: adding -mieee-fp to XTRA_CFLAGS checking whether
> flag-sort -r g++ accepts -mieee-fp... yes configure: adding
> -mieee-fp to XTRA_CXXFLAGS ... checking whether
> /sw32/bin/gfortran-fsf-4.6 accepts -mieee-fp... yes adding
> -mieee-fp to FFLAGS configure: defining FFLAGS to be -O3 -mieee-fp
>
>
> In the build output, the only thing that seemed to be different
> between the two cases was the presence of the -mieee-fp flag.
>
> I'm stumped here, so I'd appreciate any suggestions, and I'll
> gladly provide any additional information.
A couple of addenda:
1) Just to be clear: the 32-bit and 64-bit builds use the same
configuration instructions on my end.
2) I see the same thing on OS X 10.5: 64-bit works properly, 32-bit
doesn't.
3) The user who reported the problem to me has a simple test case to
illustrate the failure:
On my 64-bit build:
octave-3.4.3:1> info = struct (zeros (0, 1), {"name", "date", "bytes",
"isdir","datenum", "statinfo"});
octave-3.4.3:2> info(1,1).name = "asdf"
info =
scalar structure containing the fields:
name = asdf
date = [](0x0)
bytes = [](0x0)
isdir = [](0x0)
datenum = [](0x0)
statinfo = [](0x0)
On the 32-bit build:
octave-3.4.3:1> info = struct (zeros (0, 1), {"name", "date", "bytes",
"isdir","datenum", "statinfo"});
octave-3.4.3:2> info(1,1).name = "asdf"
error: invalid assignment to cs-list outside multiple assignment
- --
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk61MfwACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ9M1wCfWxKiDmBL5/Y+EXOx9wdL9KLk
aVQAn2rkNKsJ+9566dpDAdQU9kapO9cL
=3ArW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Alexander Hansen, 2011/11/04
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one,
Alexander Hansen <=
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Ben Abbott, 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Alexander Hansen, 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Ben Abbott, 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Alexander Hansen, 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Ben Abbott, 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Alexander Hansen, 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, c., 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Alexander Hansen, 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, c., 2011/11/05
- Re: Can't install octave-forge packages in a 32-bit OS X build, but can in a 64-bit one, Ben Abbott, 2011/11/05