Re: ML compatibility question...

[Ben Abbott]

On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:56 PM, fork wrote:

> fork <forkandwait <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> In Octave 3.4.3,  magic(0)+magic(3) gives a nonconformant error, and so does
>> magic(0).+magic(3) but magic(1)+magic(3) works ok.  I am using SDPT in my 
>> cooks
>> tour of optimization programs, and I am seeing a problem with this.
> 
> Well, I think this is due to this bug:
> 
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34800
> 
> Great minds think alike, except I am about three weeks late, ..., typical ;)
> 

I don't think it is related. The non-conformal error occurs when ever something 
like ...

        [] + rand(3)
        error: operator +: nonconformant arguments (op1 is 0x0, op2 is 3x3)

... occurs (same result for 3.4.3 and the developers sources).

Is this the error you encountered?

Ben