[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: matrix size for plotting ?
|
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
|
Subject: |
Re: matrix size for plotting ? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:06:24 +0000 |
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 5 March 2012 05:24, Christoph Ellenberger <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>> I observe the following and wanted to know if this is intended or
>> how can I circumvent my problem (eg increasing memory).
> [snip]
>> QtHandles and fltk crash for imagesc already for X>=14, while
>> gnuplot crashes for X>=16.
>
> No, a crash is never intended. Please file a bug report.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/bugs.html
I tried the VS2010 version on an Atom N270 (500MB RAM) and the imagesc
sample didn't crash with X=14 or X=16. It took ages (and filled up RAM
and swap) to render X=16 case, but that's expected. The OpenGL
renderer is inefficient poor at rendering images.
Michael.