Re: [pkg.m] Code sprint

[Sergei Steshenko]

>________________________________
> From: Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
>To: Octave Forge <address@hidden>; address@hidden; Octave Maintainers 
><address@hidden> 
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:12 PM
>Subject: Re: [pkg.m] Code sprint
> 
>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Juan Pablo Carbajal
><address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The code sprint to improve pkg.m will take place on the 17th and 18th
>> of November.
>> Choose your task here
>> http://wiki.octave.org/Code_sprint:_pkg.m
>>
>> If you still want to join us you can add yourself here or just pop in
>> in the IRC channel those days.
>> http://doodle.com/x3bh7ity5knekda8
>>
>> See you space coder ...
>
>This is just a friendly reminder of the code sprint dedicated to
>improve pkg.m to happen during the 17th and 18th of November (meeting
>point, the IRC channel #octave at irc.freenode.net).
>
>View the current lists of taks here (suggestions, commetn, potentiual
>drawbacks, please let us know)
>http://wiki.octave.org/Code_sprint:_pkg.m
>
>Read the latest post by Carnë (Forge project leader) here
>http://octave-forge.blogspot.com/2012/11/pkg-package-system-and-structure.html
>
>
>Join us!
>
>KaKiLa
>_______________________________________________
>Help-octave mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
>

Has anybody already written a _spec_ for Octave packaging ?

If not, why to step on the same rake again, i.e. what is the sense of writing 
code with no set goals and no analysis that those unset yet goals do not 
contradict each other ?

Or you think existence of SW architects is a human race mistake and they are 
unnecessary ?

Regards,
  Sergei.