[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OctDev] low level I/O (GPIB, USBTMC, VXI11)

From: Sergei Steshenko
Subject: Re: [OctDev] low level I/O (GPIB, USBTMC, VXI11)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:34:08 -0800 (PST)

----- Original Message -----
> From: Julien Salort <address@hidden>
> To: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden; "address@hidden Help" <address@hidden>; "address@hidden" 
> <address@hidden>
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [OctDev] low level I/O (GPIB, USBTMC, VXI11)
> Le 25 nov. 2012 à 19:30, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> a 
> écrit :
>>  On 25 November 2012 06:15, Julien Salort <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
>>>  Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>>>  <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>  I've never been clear if this is really ok, but it seems to be 
> a
>>>>  common interpretation.
>>>  Fine.
>>>  But then, why did you encourage me publicly, on Feb. 8th, to publish 
> the
>>>  sources ?
>>>  In case you don't remember, here is a link to the thread, entitled 
> "Data
>>>  Acquisition with Octave":
>>>  Personally, I was very reluctant to publish the sources because I 
> feared
>>>  there would be a legal issue. You are one of the people who convinced 
> me
>>>  that it is ok and that I should publish the source anyway.
>>  I'm sorry. I made a mistake. I misunderstood the GPL. I got
>>  uncomfortable with now how there is Octave code that is meant to be
>>  linked to non-free libraries, so I asked again, and it seems I was
>>  wrong about it.
>>  Please unpublish this code.
> Done.
> _______________________________________________

I am wondering what is more amusing:

1) a puppy or a kitten trying to catch its own tail;
2) a cat chasing laser pointer light spot on a wall or a floor;
3) GPL proponents shooting themselves in the foot.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]