|
From: | Rick M. Cox |
Subject: | RE: Help with saveas and fltk |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:22:44 -0700 |
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Nicholas Jankowski On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Rick M. Cox <address@hidden> wrote:
Will check it out when I'm back at work. But FYI i'm running the MinGW version on Win7, so who knows what will happen :) regarding load time, I do notice when I do other simple things in Octave it takes a long time for the first figure to load (i usually have things set to fltk). so something as simple as: plot([1 2 3]) will take a long time to run once, but a 'close all' followed by plot([1 2 3]) again will pop right up (same with any other figures after the first). so i assume that the first figure has some program loading or initialization occurring. perhaps something similar here? or is it just as slow every time? Nick: I tried my test plot and print with the MinGW version of Octave and it fails in the same way. I tried your experiment of plotting my figure followed by a ‘close all’ followed by another plot. I notice no difference in the time to plot the second instance compared to the first. This may be of interest. When I use ‘fltk’ with the following sequence everything works just fine: >sombrero >print “test.png” The figure window is scrambled for a moment but then it recovers and the file is saved. The same with: >plot (rand (3)) >print “test.png” When I switch back to: >scdraw >print “test.png” everything fails as before. I don’t know how complex the sombrero figure is compared to my Smith Chart and when I raised the complexity issue with Ben he didn’t seem to think it was relevant. Something must be different with my Smith Chart plot or the method I’m using to generate it. Rick |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |