[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave ode45 vs. Matlab ode45
|
From: |
Stephen Montgomery-Smith |
|
Subject: |
Re: Octave ode45 vs. Matlab ode45 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:48:55 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 06/14/2013 11:36 PM, Jeffrey wrote:
> Well, there's nothing wrong with using spline - except that I don't know
> how to use it (and haven't figured it out in the time between our last
> posts). I was just offering another solution.
Try using the Matlab documentation. You can access it using google
"matlab spline" - it is often easier to follow.
> In the end, ode45 is much too slow.
Have you tried lsode?
But I agree, ode45 is far slower than matlab's. I wish I knew the
reason why. Like I said earlier, I believe the problem is with the
speed of the interpreter. If that is the case, lsode won't be of any help.