|From:||James Sherman Jr.|
|Subject:||Re: imresize and ImageJ|
|Date:||Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:56:14 -0400|
I am surprised that the std dev could go up significantly when down sampling
by a integer factor. Perhaps I am just not understanding the goal of
imresize and interp2. I would have expected the desired output for each
pixel to be the best estimate of the new pixel location. It would seem to me
that this should almost always result in the std dev dropping.
View this message in context: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/imresize-and-ImageJ-tp4666125p4666133.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Help-octave mailing list
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|