|Subject:||Re: Table data type|
|Date:||Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:44:25 +0100|
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 22:28 +0100, Markus Bergholz wrote:
> the table is (afaik) just a classdef thing (a set of structures).
> the hard work is to make the column names dynamically. How ever, a
> few weeks ago I've started the table stuff but get stuck while
> overloading subsref and substruct...
Your implementation seems to be using old-style classes. Have you seen
if we have enough classdef in the upcoming 4.0 for this task? Would it
be any easier?
- Jordi G. H.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|