|Subject:||Re: Poor plot performance on Windows|
|Date:||Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:17:35 -0400|
Tried the same script on lubuntu, just as slow actually. I think ghostscript is the bottleneck.
Why would I pay when no one apparently knows what the problem is?On Mar 16, 2016 10:23 AM, "Mike Miller" <address@hidden> wrote:On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:12:01 -0700, Jake wrote:
> I agree entirely. It seems like it was worst in 3.6-3.8 IIRC and got better
> in 4.0, but it's still bad.
Plotting is extremely usable in most GNU/Linux environments, which is
where Octave is primarily developed.
> I was looking at prices for MATLAB yesterday
> because it took 30-45 minutes to run the script in question when it
> should've taken a minute tops.
If spending money to fix this problem is an option, would you consider
paying a developer to work on improving Octave's plotting performance in
Windows? See http://www.octave.org/commercial_support.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|