[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: consistent legend size, interactive vs batch
|
From: |
johnsmith123 |
|
Subject: |
Re: consistent legend size, interactive vs batch |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2016 05:36:28 -0800 (PST) |
NJank wrote
> are you sure you're under fltk for the two non-gnuplot ones?
> ...
> while the outputs change quite a bit between
> graphics tookits, I do not get any differences between on-screen
> appearance
> or printed appearance
available_graphics_toolkits only reports 'gnuplot' and 'fltk'.
i am merely concerned with differences in printed output of FLTK (gnuplot
raises other issues but still produces the same inconsistencies between
interactive and batch versions) in batch (run from script) vs. interactive
mode.
I used 'octave-cli --norc --silent' to produce those plots (with gnuplot
commented and with the filename changed in interactive)
The version i currently use was built from source, i might try to reproduce
the issue later on a prebuilt version.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/consistent-legend-size-interactive-vs-batch-tp4681177p4681187.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.