[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Critical matrix sparsity

From: Nicholas Jankowski
Subject: Re: Critical matrix sparsity
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:54:59 -0400

On Jun 8, 2017 5:52 PM, "siko1056" <address@hidden> wrote:
dariodematties wrote

your matrix is really sparse, then the number of columns n should be smaller
than the number of rows m (transpose if not). Otherwise you waste space for
storing zero columns.

Maybe a naive side question, but wouldn't it make sense to have the transposition automatic and transparent as part of the storage class? A "transposed?" flag and the check would be the only overhead.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]