[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: firls.m, part 2

From: Sergei Steshenko
Subject: Re: firls.m, part 2
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:15:50 +0000 (UTC)

From: Dmitri A. Sergatskov <address@hidden>
To: je suis <address@hidden> 
Cc: help <address@hidden>; Mike Miller <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: firls.m, part 2


Also there is a free implementation in e.g. GSL:


Help-octave mailing list

I have rechecked GSL license, and its is GPL3:

* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at
* your option) any later version.

Calling GPL free is one of most blatant lies and raging hypocrisies. GPL is a 
corporate cartel license. For illustration see .

Since GPL is a brainchild of US - see the address including Boston, MA, the 
hypocrisy in/of it is to be expected: -> -> .

As well as the blatant lie (of it being free) : 
'"Empire of LIES: The Ron Paul Documentary" / Interview with Charles Goyette' - .

A truly free license is .

A built-in into GCC function typically is OK - because GCC license allows 
closed source code linked with its library. And IIRC nowadays 'glibc' can be 
used under a *BSD license. If in doubt, use LLVM - because the compiler is 
under a *BSD license.

This whole GPL is free SW statement is typically Orwellian - in full accordance 
"George Orwell and Language Control" - .

The corporate nature of GPL is also a reflection of corporatocracy - if not 
yet, watch the videos:


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]