[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug#366526: [mostly-dummy-RC] Don't migrate; changes planned

From: Simon Josefsson
Subject: Re: Bug#366526: [mostly-dummy-RC] Don't migrate; changes planned
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:17:24 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

FYI, today's daily build solves both of these issues: the shishid
package is renamed to shishi-kdc, and there is a libpam-shishi
package.  They are lintian clean too.

One question: How to handle the package renaming?  Should shishi-kdc
have these fields:

     Provides: shishid
     Conflicts: shishid
     Replaces: shishid

This seems to be the only thing left for 0.0.26 and a new upload.


Elrond <address@hidden> writes:

> Package: shishi
> Version: 0.0.25-1
> Severity: serious
> Hi,
> I file this bug mostly to stop shishi from migrating from
> unstable to testing, because:
> We (shishi debian team) consider/plan
> 1) Renaming shishid to shishi-kdc
> 2) Adding pam_shishi
> As (1) has a bigger impact, if shishi were in testing, we
> decided: If we want to do it, it should be done before any
> migration to testing.
> That said, (1) requires manual approval by the ftp masters.
> Which is somewhat annoying to them for only a rename.
> (2) on the other hand requires that too. So the idea is to
> combine both to annoy the ftp-masters only once.
> This bug also is here to give
> - us the time to decide on (1) and (2)
> - us the time to do (1) correctly
> - us the time to do (2)
> - debian users a very slight chance of knowing, that a
>   rename might happen
>     Elrond

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]