[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Patch to add unsigned int support...

From: David Forster
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Patch to add unsigned int support...
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 04:41:46 -0600
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22i

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:54:26AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> > I've tested this with both passing uints/ulongs and returning them.
> > I've also testing sending true/false to functions asking for
> > ulongs/uints.  I've also, of course, tested all this against large
> > ints (2^32-1) and things seem to all work OK.
> Have you tried sending them to regular #int's? Returning uInts
> makes sense, but passing them should be equivalent to
> passing ints.
You're right... IMHO, however, I think it's still a good idea to
accept #uLong and #uInt as arguments for readability and symmetry.
I've attached a revised patch...


Attachment: uint.diff
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]