[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: GST SDL Bindings
From: |
Brad Watson |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: GST SDL Bindings |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:49:34 -0800 (PST) |
Stephen,
The method names were initially generated by swig: swig "camel-cased" the c
delclaration in the SDL header files to generate the method-names.
I agree that they could be merged. I kept them a part for now with the thought
it might keep debugging simpler (and make it easier to remove parts if some of
the libraries are not installed.)
Kind regards,
Brad Watson
----- Original Message ----
From: Stephen Compall <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 4:27:38 PM
Subject: [Help-smalltalk] Re: GST SDL Bindings
> Object subclass: #SdlVideo
> ...
> category: 'SdlVideo Wrapper'! !
>
> Object subclass: #SdlThread
> ...
> category: 'SdlThread Wrapper'! !
Perhaps these etc. could be merged into a single category?
> imgLoadTypedRW: aCobject0 freeSrc: aInt1 type: aString2
Out of curiosity, why do the cCall method names all start with type
prefixes?
--
Stephen Compall
http://scompall.nocandysw.com/blog
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
____________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: GST SDL Bindings,
Brad Watson <=