Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: Building on Windows XP

[Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz]

Is not more easy to do something like this: (with relative paths)
- Search this scripts in script folder where gst was called. ifFalse[
- Search this scripts on the same path where gst was called.] ifFalse[
- Search this scripts on scripts fodler when gst binary resides]  
ifFalse [
- Search this scripts on the same path where gst resides] ifFalse[
- Search this scripts on lib folder ........]

With this usage, if you can, for example, do some changes to Remote.st  
for testing purposes, Create a scripts folder with Remote.st and  
change it, and if it fails, you only need to rename it to load the  
"original". What do you think?

Sorry for the ifFalse..I'm on Newbie-Smalltalk-Mode now :D

I'm like a kid with new shoes :D (this is an spanish expression, I  
don't know if it understand in english).

El 31/05/2008, a las 11:16, Paolo Bonzini escribió:

> > > Remove lines 34-38 of C:\msys\1.1\local\share\smalltalk\scripts 
> > > \Remote.st to fix this.
> > Ok, I ill try, but, Why it links to this folder? If this, we can  
> > not release a windows binary as it.
>
> That folder is created by "make install".  There is a relatively  
> complicated thing known as "relocatable installation", but it is too  
> early to experiment with it if the "normal" installation has to be  
> sorted out yet. :-)
>
> Paolo