|
From: | Giuseppe Luigi Punzi |
Subject: | Re: [Help-smalltalk] Porting OmniBrowser |
Date: | Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:36:27 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Jan Vrany escribió:
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 14:10 +0200, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi wrote:Can you repeat the URL please :POh, sorry. Once again: http://smalltalk.felk.cvut.cz/download/vranyj1/OmniBrowser.zip
Downloaded. I will check it.
Can you explain a little until where you advanced?Hmm, I did it in one evening a year ago... Well, I'll try to dust-off my memories: 1) OmniBrowser consists of many packages. Loading up-to-date version of them from monticello is not the best way, simply because they might not work together. Better to look at latestdev-image and use versions in that image. At least in initial phases...2) OB (including OB-Browser) uses lot of Squeak classes and methods - they must be ported also. ActionSequence.st, Squeak-compatibility.st, SystemOrganizer are just some of them.This may require lot of "run-see-port from squeak" round trips.
I'm starting to sweat :P
view?Jan, could you please share your idea from the widget point of3) I planned to make it pure GTK-based. I'm personally not convincedthat BLOX is the right way.
And are you working on this now?
Jan
Cheers, and thanks.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |