[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk

From: Sean Allen
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:32:12 -0500

While I use debian all the time and have for years, the package terminology is something I've never bothered to learn.

So question, what is a backport?

On Jan 5, 2009, at 12:43 PM, address@hidden wrote:

Hello all,

Indeed I maintain Debian GNU Smalltalk packages, and the version in stable is really old.

Would you be interested in 3.1 backport for etch?



----- Mail Original -----
De: "Paolo Bonzini" <address@hidden>
À: "Sean Allen" <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Janvier 2009 17:05:36 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk

No, I didn't- I only ever use the stable branch. I was tired when i
asked the question
and completely missed that the last stable gnu smalltalk in debian
stable is a 2.1.x
version. Usually they are good about keeping packages for gnu stuff up
to date,
must not have a maintainer for the gnu smalltalk anymore.

No, there is one (Thomas Girard).  ISTR that testing is okay, probably
3.0.x or 3.1, because GNU Smalltalk missed by very little the deadline
for the last stabilization.


help-smalltalk mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]