Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: Iliad - updatePage: aPage

[Stefan Schmiedl]

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:59:34 +0200
Nicolas Petton <address@hidden> wrote:

> >  And with the page not being available to
> > the application any more, it would be non-trivial to get to the
> > body element.
> > 
> > For the sake of the discussion: updateHead: and updateBody:?
> 
> What would be the reason for having two methods?

descriptive method names? I'm not sure of those myself, I just thought
I'd bring them up.

> > I still haven't explored how Iliad deals with decorators and what
> > kind of things they can do. Assuming that they can wrap their
> > contents: Would it make sense to implement the body tag as
> > decorator?
> 
> Hmm. I'm not sure I like the idea. How could this be useful? The body
> element is just an element :)

Aha... then decorators have to be widgets for that to be an argument :-)

really off to work now,
s.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature