[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Anyone willing to maintain the Squeak port of Iliad

From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Anyone willing to maintain the Squeak port of Iliad?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:07:23 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-3.9.b4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4

On 11/20/2009 01:04 AM, Nicolas Petton wrote:

Maintaining two versions of Iliad takes some time me and seb don't
really have, but OTHO we don't want the Squeak/Pharo port to die.

So, you there be someone who knows Squeak willing to maintain the Squeak

I think it doesn't work out unless you make a list of:

1) what classes are different and why

2) how the coding standards for Iliad help portability

3) if you can use some kind of rewrite expression to achieve most of the result.

Deciding on the namespace vs. prefix issue will also help figuring out how to automate the conversion as much as possible.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]