[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Help-smalltalk] MIT strikes back (was Re: [smalltalk-research] Re: [Esu

From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Help-smalltalk] MIT strikes back (was Re: [smalltalk-research] Re: [Esug-list] Google Summer Of Code 2010 news!!!)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:16:47 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1

On 03/10/2010 05:06 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
What the starting point is will depend on to what extent Cog has
been open sourced  (Teleplace may choose to open source
single-threaded Cog initially, keeping back the threaded FFI for
a while, it may not open source Cog at all; we'll see :) ).
May be I the only one to notice the:)   which I have problem to
understand since for me it announces that COG may not be

Isn't this what you wanted to allow companies to do, when you chose the
MIT license?  I don't understand, why should you care?

I see some irony...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]