[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] short list of possible smalltalk extensions
From: |
Stefan Schmiedl |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] short list of possible smalltalk extensions |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2010 01:11:05 +0100 |
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:18:28 +0100
Gwenaël Casaccio <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What about that:
>
> x foo: 1 :> bar: 2 :> baz: 3 :> zork: 4 instead of (((x foo: 1) bar:
> 2) baz: 3) zork: 4
oooohhh... that would eliminate my favorite reason for hitting
the up arrow when writing code.
But it is a good step on the slippery slope towards complex
operator precedence rules.
s.
>
> (from vasily bikov blog: http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/08/30/message-chains/)
>
> Gwen