[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] ZeroMQ binding

From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] ZeroMQ binding
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:56:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 03/29/2011 05:30 AM, Vijay Mathew wrote:
Checked in a few samples:


Just a couple of comments on the API. You may want to rename #while:receiveSend: with #whileTrue:receiveSend: (or #whileTrue:respond:, but I'm focusing on the first keyword mostly) and add a corresponding #whileFalse: handler.

In general, it seems like you're favoring a programming style with many cascades and blocks to handle code snippets that would have a different receiver. It looks nice in your examples but (as a complete newbie in 0MQ) would it scale to real-world cases?

Thanks for your work,


ps: I noticed now your email addresses, and that explains your love for blocks ;)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]