[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Memory management, OOM, Exceptions

From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Memory management, OOM, Exceptions
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:16:24 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:13:46PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Yes, that is the reason.  It avoids fragmentation of the heap.


it makes sense. I am looking at it from the side of running gst on
a 128MB RAM machine and no possible with no overcommit. This would
bring me back to the question if one could introduce a switch to
have fewer possible OOPs/Objects?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]