[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH]Remove security framework

From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH]Remove security framework
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:19:46 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:34:26PM +0100, Gwenaël Casaccio wrote:


> And as Paolo says it was never really used.

well, that is a good reason. There is no reason to have a half done
security framework.

> >>-  p.untrustedContext = IS_OOP_UNTRUSTED (_gst_this_context_oop);
> >>+  p.untrustedContext = false;
> >What is the reason to leave the untrustedContext around?
> Thanks I will remove it

thanks. What would be very nice is to have something like sunspider for
GST. A set of tests/examples that we want to optimize for (because I am
biased it would be the GSM parsing and formating code I have) and run
the benchmark after any libgst/ and kernel/ change.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]