[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Marking lisp expressions
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Marking lisp expressions |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:22:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:22:22PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
> Thank you for the information.
>
> I was replying to Gavin's "makeinfo is not part of Emacs" as a reason to not
> use Emacs facilities. makeinfo is neither part of TeX and still uses it as a
> dependency.
>
> Also, as writen in the manual, makeinfo does not install the TeX subsystem
> and there is no indication regarding what the minimum requirement is, just a
> link to "texlive". Emacs is mentionned all over the manual and since info
> manuals are only a requirement for the Gnu system it is unlikely that texinfo
> writers/makeinfo users don't have a copy of emacs on their machines.
>
> Just like "Formating and Printing Hardcopy" indicates the TeX requirement,
> "Generating HTML" could have a "syntax highlighting" subsection that
> indicates the emacs requirement.
Possibly, but somebody would have to work out how to do that. I suspect
there are other programs that could be used to do syntax highlighting,
such as GNU Source-highlight
(https://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite/). Maybe there are other
programs that people know about.
> But maybe Gavin was thinking about having syntax highlighting for all the
> output formats that support color output ?
Not especially.