[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface

From: Roland McGrath
Subject: Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:43:19 -0400 (EDT)

> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 05:45:09PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I see.  In that case, your earlier idea of mapping keys to symlinks
> > and ids to file names seems appropriate.
> How about stat information (e.g. attach time, detach time, etc)?

Please be specific (lists that are specific don't include "etc") and give
the details about what concerns you.  Firstly, I haven't read the full
spec.  More importantly, I don't consider whatever SysV spec there is for
shm to be intrinsically worth implementing for its own sake for the sake of
conformance per se (to some single-vendor so-called "standard").  So it
matters to know what the real-world uses of some particular feature are
before caring about it.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]