[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Getting the control port from a translator

From: Neal H Walfield
Subject: Re: Getting the control port from a translator
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:10:56 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i

> It's more important to me that all the kinds of permission checking be
> centralized into a small number of spots all in fshelp, than what the
> actual policy is (because it's easy to change it later in just one place).


> I'm sure you didn't suggest the name "fshelp_iscontroler" before, because I
> surely would have insisted at least that you call it "fshelp_iscontroller"
> instead.

In fact, you are correct.

I forgot to include reference to this message:, where I
suggest that there is no difference between fshelp_isowner and
fshelp_iscontroller.  Comments?

Attachment: pgpPLRJKSlvjX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]