[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Objdump report posted
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: Objdump report posted |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:00:49 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:19:16PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Any particular reason you excluded the binutils packages?
It was cross compiled badly, and I'm a little uncertain of it.
Specifically the binaries got misnamed as i386-gnu-xxx, so I'm not
sure what else was weird.
I'm also not sure why those showed up as Linux binaries. I'm fairly
certain those were natively compiled. =( I have to do some paying work
tonight, but I'll try and get binutils and gcc natively built. So far
we're still working off of the cross compiled versions.
> After getting rid of the bogus Linux binaries included, the output of my
> little awk script on your file contains no "mach" or "hurd" anywhere in it.
> So that's a good sign! Later on tonight I will look over it in detail,
> but I suspect we are in good shape now.
Cool, thanks!
--
Some people play the lottery, some people use Ebay. Personally, I've
had much better luck with Ebay than the lottery
- hendridm