[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proxy memory objects

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: proxy memory objects
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:14:41 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:02:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden> writes:
> > However, I think I will change the function name of the hack to
> > mach_create_memory_object_proxy, to illustrate the target of the RPC better
> > and leave the memory_object_* name space to the memory object (and control)
> > interface.
> Yes, I think this is the right strategy.  So we need two additional
> interfaces, one called mach_create_memory_object_proxy, and one called
> memory_object_create_proxy.

Yes, but as I said, we don't need the latter one right away to fix the
security hole.  It can be added at any later time just as well.


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU    address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann              The Hurd

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]