|
From: | Robert Weiner |
Subject: | Re: [Hyperbole-users] Hyperbole vs. Org-mode outlining |
Date: | Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:26:55 -0400 |
Org has very useful facilities there. I would say that Koutliner's properties are much more lisp-like and separate from the visible buffer text, so you maintain a cleaner view of what you are working on, though I understand the properties can be collapsed in Org-mode.But org-mode also has much more generic notion of a node. It understands source blocks, example blocks, result blocks, headlines etc. Obviously I have way less experience with Koutliner but it seems to understand only chunks of text.
How do you reference a headline without including much of its text?Adding names with special syntax again visually litters the buffer.Koutlines have built-in link anchorswith no extra effort.See above, the special syntax is due to org's more flexible notion of a node.
If I have 100 nodes in a list, imagine how long it would take to create all the named references and hyperlinks in Org-mode versus pointing and clicking to generate the links only in the Koutliner.Without programming, yes, that would be a pain. Furthermore org does not update internal links when a subtree is re-parented etc. Hopefully Koutliner is better in this regard.
Hyperbole is certainly good for embedding explicit and implicit links within comments of programming languages and also giving you implicit links within the code.org-babel supports literate programming in the more traditional form, chunks of code interspersed into a document rather than vice versa. Although implicit links from comment is a very nice feature.
I'm excited about the future of Hyperbole. I see a lot of potential with third-party custom button packages, language specific implicit links, perhaps even leveraging Koutliner for literate programming so I hope that a community builds up around it. Org-mode was just an outliner until people grabbed it and ran with it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |