[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ifile-discuss] What is best? -h or not to -h
From: |
Preben Randhol |
Subject: |
Re: [Ifile-discuss] What is best? -h or not to -h |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:49:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Karl Vogel <address@hidden> wrote on 19/04/2003 (10:38) :
> I recommend "-h" because the resulting database is smaller and more
> tightly focused. Other headers (Received:, etc.) from a spammer
> might be close enough to non-spam to trigger a false positive. I
> definitely get better results with "-h".
I notice the same too today. Yesterday I retrained ifile using "-h"
and I also downloaded several Mb of spam mail from:
http://www.em.ca/~bruceg/spam/
and let Ifile run over half of it during the day. Then I made a
script that goes through each of my folder and checks if there are a
mail in this folder that Ifile thinks should be in another folder and
use the ifile -d IFILES_FOLDER -u MY_FOLDER. After running the script
several Ifile agreed with me, except in the Spam folder, but it will
come over time. :-)
Preben