[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags)
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags) |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:54:01 -0500 |
Donald Sharp wrote:
> Here are some sample cvs history -T output(s):
>
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd bar.c 1.3 [d:A]
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd foo.c 1.1 [d:A]
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd bar.c 1.4 [b:M]
> T 2000-11-29 15:22 +0000 sharpd bar.c [b:D]
> T 2000-11-29 15:22 +0000 sharpd foo.c [b:D]
>
> Is this ok? What do people think?
Assuming "[d:A]" means symbolic tag "d" was added, "[b:M]" means tag "b" was
moved,
and "[b:D]" means tag "b" was deleted:
1) Will sdir/foo.c look the same as othersdir/foo.c? I ask only because all
of the
other history commands seem to keep <file> and <repodir> as separate fields.
2) Will a symbolic tag be included in the history if it was specified in the
tag
command? e.g. 'cvs tag -roldtag -b newtag" would list "oldtag" somewhere as
well as
"newtag". I know this seems somewhat redundant, but it gives the user the
ability
to make quick analyses such as, "Oh, Betty created a maintenance branch from
the 4.0
release"... Perhaps a "from rev" (see below) format similar to, "symtag:numrev"
when necessary?
3) I'd like to see a "from rev" and a "to rev" for a move ("M") command. I
know
the information is available form playing with taginfo.
4) Ditto for a "from rev" for delete ("D") ops.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:address@hidden OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
Suburbia: Where they tear out the trees and name the streets after them.
- hitory of the tags, Anner Adrian, 2000/11/27
- Re: hitory of the tags, Larry Jones, 2000/11/27
- Re: hitory of the tags, Jorge Godoy, 2000/11/27
- Re: hitory of the tags, Alex Melnick, 2000/11/27
- Re: hitory of the tags, Donald Sharp, 2000/11/28
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/28
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Mike Sutton, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Donald Sharp, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Donald Sharp, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags),
Derek R. Price <=
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Donald Sharp, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Larry Jones, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Donald Sharp, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Larry Jones, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Derek R. Price, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Donald Sharp, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Laine Stump, 2000/11/29
- Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags), Mike Sutton, 2000/11/29