[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp
|
From: |
Larry Jones |
|
Subject: |
Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:44:31 -0500 (EST) |
Richard Cobbe writes:
>
> I may be picking at nits, but I want to make sure I have this right before
> I create a new repository at work.
>
> Sticky bit or set-gid bit? I'd expect the latter.
It is the latter. Sorry I overlooked that in my earlier message.
-Larry Jones
I hate being good. -- Calvin
- sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Paul D. Smith, 2001/02/20
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Larry Jones, 2001/02/20
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Richard Cobbe, 2001/02/20
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Laine Stump, 2001/02/22
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Larry Jones, 2001/02/22
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Laine Stump, 2001/02/22
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/22
- Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp, Laine Stump, 2001/02/22