[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updating CVS/Entries
From: |
R Bresner |
Subject: |
Re: Updating CVS/Entries |
Date: |
Tue, 8 May 2001 14:29:18 -0400 |
Ooops.
Yeah, it's working.
I had an old Entries~ file from emacs
(the script I wrote checks Entries*, in case there's .log
or whatever.)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Jones" <address@hidden>
To: "R Bresner" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: Updating CVS/Entries
> R Bresner writes:
> >
> > Is there a way to update the CVS/Entries file timestamps
> > to avoid having cvs go to the repository to check for diffs?
> > cvs update doesn't do it (I thought it would).
>
> If I understand what you're asking, "cvs update" *should* do what you
> want. If the timestamp on a file doesn't match what's in CVS/Entries,
> the client sends the file to the server. If the server finds that the
> file isn't any different than what's in the repository, it sends back a
> Checked-in response, which is supposed to cause the client to update
> CVS/Entries appropriately. The command-line version of CVS certainly
> works that way, at least on Unix.
>
> -Larry Jones
>
> I like maxims that don't encourage behavior modification. -- Calvin