Re: [Fwd: Meta-issue: recent spam surge]

[Derek Robert Price]

"J. Cone" wrote:

> What's it actually going to do?  Junk the messages or put them aside for a
> person to look at?
>
> If it's going to junk them, then any significant risk of junking a
> legitimate message has got to be a worry.
>
> At 15:25 13/09/01 -0700, David Taylor wrote:
> >Derek Robert Price wrote:
> >
> >> Anyone have any objections to this spam filter being applied to the
> >> info-cvs and bug-cvs lists?
> >>
> >> Aside from the "(no subject)" filter which would filter the cvsbug
> >> generated emails on bug-cvs, of course.
> >>
> >> Derek

Yeah.  How about if it bounced them back to the sender with a list of the
filtered keywords.  Most spam artists shouldn't be able to adapt to that
since they don't use real addresses anyhow.

After I include the necessary changes pointed out by David Taylor as well.

Derek